I watched the pilot for the series “Revolution”. I think it is still available to view free on
Hulu. I’m debating as to whether
or not I like it.
There are intriguing elements, at least in the initial
effort. I am reminded a little of S.M. Stirling’s
Emberverse series, a faint touch of the
classic Lucifer’s Hammer, a bit of The Postman, and, oddly enough, Mel
Gibson’s revolutionary war piece, The
Patriot, but I’m not particularly impressed with the way the pieces are
woven together. And I could not help
wondering, as I watched, What would Joss Whedon do with this?
The premise is that electricity, including batteries, has
ceased to work, at least in the entire Western Hemisphere, possibly and most
reasonably (not that “reason” applies in television) world-wide. Cars won’t run – which makes no sense because
a very similar reaction, the explosion of gunpowder in a firearm does
work. I suppose one could argue that if electricity were suppressed, you couldn't have a spark jump the gap. What about diesels? What about steam engines? The people seem to be able to start regular fires easily enough. Some of the characters have black
powder muzzle-loading weapons. I suppose
that is because they are relatively low-tech in terms of the steel quality
needed. My grandfather was a blacksmith
and could supposedly build a muzzleloader and rifle the barrel. Useable black powder is a fairly simple
chemical compound of sulfur and nitrates and can be manufactured under
primitive conditions. Primers or caps
are not so easy, but there are always flintlocks. Sparks?
(I know, I know, stop picking it apart. It's television, and it is, after all, just as realistic as that show about the gay guys in drag buying shoes in New York.)
One of the characters has a modern smokeless, auto-loading
handgun – likely an artifact from before the electricity went out. There is possibly a limited supply of
pre-change ammunition to which some have access. We are told that having a firearm, modern or
primitive, is a “hanging offense” for those who are not part of the ruling
power’s "militia".
By the way, "militia" is misused here as it often is. These units are the standing armies of the warlords. They are not militias raised from the population of males of military age. They are supported by taxes -- mostly a percentage of the crops and stock, apparently -- taken from those living in the area under a given warlord's control.
While teaching children, a character says that physics no
longer functions as expected. I believe
his exact quote was that physics went wild.
If that were the case, it went wild in a pretty convenient fashion. There is a way to get around the failure of
electric current using a computer thumb-drive that looks like a locket. In the opening scene, we see the father of
the main protagonist desperately dumping files from a laptop to the
thumb-drive. This quickly becomes the
main vector of the plot. We also learn
that this locket is not the only one – that there are other people around who
can get electric current to flow again.
Aside from the ragged logic of the plot, the characters are
about what one would expect from a basic action-adventure show. There’s not a lot of development in the
pilot. Heroes are reluctant. All the women are strong, and all the men are
good-looking – OK, not the amazingly-still-overweight-after-fifteen-years-of-subsistence
former Google executive, but most of the rest.
For the women, cosmetics and shampoo seem to still be generally
available. Which is good. One thing I did like was that they did not
have the female protagonist unrealistically kicking male butt in bare-knuckle
brawls – not yet, at least. I like the
bows and crossbows and edged weapons, of course. Archery has picked up in interest in the
aftermath of The Hunger Games. We’re all for that.
So far I would say I’m neutral on "Revolution". It’s not a horrifically
bad show. It is not a stunning
achievement, either. Apparently an overall arc of the story is going to be about people who want to restore the good old U.S. of A via a revolution against the warlord-controlled regional "republics". That might help, but I am skeptical. The odds are that it will be ham-fistedly mishandled and make a mediocre show much worse. I ask again, Where is Joss Whedon when you really need him? Off making an Avengers movie that I am never, most likely, going to see. It's sad.
You are not going
to learn much in the way of survival skills, real-world preparations, or
tactics while watching. I have my doubts
about it lasting very long, but while it does, if it happens to be on, you
might find it entertaining.
I like a good post-apocalyptic story as much as the next guy, maybe more. But you gotta make the science believable. Is that too much to ask? Maybe there is a continuous solar flare or something. That sort of stuff kills it for me.
ReplyDeleteJust the other night my wife and I are watching an episode of "Breaking Bad" and a gun dealer is holding up a "Nickel plated brass, hollow point.." something or other. The only problem is, it's brass colored. Well it looked that way to me. It kills the mood, man. I'll wait for your next review of "Revolution". Thanks for doing the heavy lifting for us.
Guns on TV are hilarious. Books, too. There are probably a lot of reasons to hate Dan Brown, but I actually feel sorry for him. My daughter was staying with us a few years back and picked up Brown's first book about computer encryption and the government scanning emails and stuff. She thought it was good, but she reads stuff like John Grisham. Anyway, she told me I'd like it.
ReplyDeleteIt was quickly apparent that Brown knew nothing about computers. Then he had a bad guy shoot a person in a Catholic church during Mass with a silenced handgun. Nobody noticed. Worse yet, it was the classic "silenced" revolver. So he knows nothing about guns or computers.
I think Brown was an English Lit instructor or professor at some small college, but that first book -- I haven't read any of his others -- was pretty poorly written apart from the purely annoying stuff. I was surprised at how weak it was.