Reprehensible

I hate to give Politico a hit, but I don't want anyone to think I'm making anything up.

The White House calls the Afghan corpse photos "Reprehensible".

You know what's reprehensible?  Undercutting your own people, your troops, the ones who put their lives on the line day in and day out so you can play golf and dress-up. 

These men and women are in situations in which the faggoty little piss-ant currently inhabiting the White House would most likely crap in his pants and try to find a real man or woman to hide behind.  Obama apologized for the Koran burning without knowing what the situation was, and he was wrong.  He spouts off about this situation when it is, at worst, a matter of bad taste.

I am willing to give the Administration credit for one thing in that they expressed "disappointment" in the LA Times for publishing the pictures. 

What the troops did was "reprehensible" but what the press did was just "disappointing".  Does that seem backwards to you?

Here's my favorite part from the Pentagon spokes-wienie:

The danger is that this material could be used by the enemy to incite violence against U.S. and Afghan service members in Afghanistan.

These are the same Taliban who have been planting roadside bombs and attacking U.S. and NATO forces for the last ten years.  These are the same Afghans who murdered Americans back in February because some of their defaced holy books were burned.  I would really be worried about inciting violence among these goat-loving bastards.  

I just can't figure out if the leaders in this country are complete idiots or if they think that I am.