There are some who think the film It’s a Wonderful Life has a socialist
theme to it. I suppose I can understand
that, but I don’t believe it. The film
is about one man who lives a life of sacrifice for the good of his
neighbors. Government is involved only
peripherally and hardly mentioned at all.
No one forces George Bailey to make the choices that shape Bedford Falls
into a good community and that keep it good.
In fact, if anything in It’s a Wonderful Life speaks of or stands for
government, it would be Potter. Apart
from force and intimidation, Potter is impotent. He has his sycophants, certainly, but he is
more feared than respected. He believes
that he knows what is best for people.
His motivation seems to be to make himself the focus of life. We see this carried out in George’s vision of
the alternate universe where it is no longer Bedford Falls but
Pottersville. While Potter is the
stereotypical “tycoon” and thus could be said to represent the heartless
for-profit motive, his “business model” is somewhat questionable. I am pretty sure he could make more money if
he partnered with George and helped him improve the community further – drawing
in new businesses and factories.
But, like government, Potter can tolerate no rivalries. He must be in control even to his own
detriment. Potter also reflects government
in his goal to be master rather than servant.
George Bailey serves his community.
Potter demands service from the community. Government – under control – should be a
servant. Out-of-control government, such
as we have now, has subjects rather than citizens.
It’s a Wonderful Life transcends politics or social commentary. It addresses the fundamental issues of
liberty and goodness. People should be as
free of restraint and compulsion as possible.
The importance of private property, of homeowners, investors, and small business
people is emphasized. It is perhaps the
source of some of the criticism of the film that a certain segment of the
population will find George Bailey’s stellar character unbelievable. Yet there are many who might be George,
millions of simple, honest, self-sacrificing people going about their lives
every day. They do not make the
news. No journalist is interested in
their life story because it is so commonplace.
This brings me to George Zimmerman. Here was a man, not unlike George Bailey,
going about his life, doing what he could for his community. He helped the less fortunate. He looked out for his neighbors. For his efforts, he was labeled by the media
as a racist vigilante. But George
Zimmerman, like the other George, had friends – people in the community who
knew him, who trusted and believed in him.
They refused to stand silently by as Zimmerman was electronically
lynched. Even when the President sided
against him, his friends stuck with him.
This, gentle reader, is the real template for the new
revolution. Government intervention
continues to make matter worse.
Governments are going rogue from Argentina to Athens. They are ignoring the restraints of
constitutions. They are failing to honor
their debts. They are debasing their
currencies. Like any addict, the fiat-currency-addicted
governments will deny the truth and seek just one more hit. The abyss awaits. The abyss is very patient.
When the financial and governmental system finally
collapses, the model we want is not post-Katrina New Orleans. It is not Mad Max, The Road, The Postman, or
Zombieland. We want Bedford Falls. We will need to know who to trust.
There may be some good people in Washington, D.C., but I do
not know them. I know my local
banker. I know the county deputy. I know the dairy farmer up the road. I know the contractor on the other side of
me, the nurseryman on the next place, and the mechanic up on the hill. I am not as involved with my local church as
I used to be, but I know my pastor and some of the leaders. I know members who are reliable and
like-minded. If any of my friends or
relatives are targeted or attacked by central government minions – whether bureaucrats
or journalists – I must be willing to defend them. And I can hope they will come to my aid if I
am in need.
You see, Potter could not attack his enemy directly, but
circumstances gave him a means and a plan to turn the town against George
Bailey. So, too, the government always
seeks to enhance its own power by dividing us as citizens one against the
other. This is why the purveyors of “news”
are so quick to speak of black against white, young against old, male against
female, rich against poor. Without
divisions and labels, the collectivist agenda is dead. When it ceases to be “the rich”, and it becomes
your own hard-working, family-oriented, church-going employer, their battle is
lost. When the story ceased to be a
gun-crazed vigilante chasing down an innocent, immature teenager and became
George Zimmerman, a man of mixed blood, a mentor to black youth, a veritable
pillar of his community, the hounds where thrown off the trail.
It does not take too much digging around the internet to
find people talking about guerrilla warfare tactics, violent resistance,
weapons, and defense. I sincerely hope there is no need
for it ever to come to that point. And I believe we can avoid it. Study
the language, the metaphors, and the analogies of freedom. Know the people around you and make yourself
known. The backbone of Alinsky's tactics is to identify an individual, attempt to isolate (freeze) that targeted person, and polarize him or her. Do not let that
happen. We are in a war, but it is a war
we can win without ever firing a shot if we will stick together. You don’t have to agree with everything
someone thinks, says, or believes in order to come alongside and give them support. Turn the tables on the collectivists. Refuse to accept the artificial
divisions. Focus on individuals.
Funny. Some time ago when I was following your blog a thought I recurrently had is that if things really do go sour, the bunker antics would probably be little effective against a persistent, organized, and cunning offence. A read through some depressing periods of Europe, and I mean death-through-famine style of depression, coupled with the current civil warfare which is censured from the news, one can take a guess on what extent ruthless groups of people are willing to go not to have something to eat, but merely to maintain status. It might be that to survive our connections and the strength of those connections are vital. Today I was somewhat surprised to read your post. Hence the long comment.
ReplyDeleteThe thing that was the seeded this post was reading one of these guys who was talking about the tactics to use to defend against aggression on the part of authorities. Like you said, I just kept thinking that not only will that not work long-term, it's just not what we want to happen. Nor is it necessary.
ReplyDeleteBe the kind of person that your neighbors trust and look to for leadership, and they will support you and stand behind you in tough times. In the long run, a Saturday helping clean the sanctuary at church may be worth more than a dozen trips to the shooting range.