GayPatriot's Pickup Truck Foo is Better Than Our Pickup Truck Foo

From GayPatriot: 

What Does Sola Scriptura Have To Do With It?

E. Ray Moore is a home-school/Christian school advocate running for state attorney general in South Carolina.  Here is a link to a piece about Moore by Dr. Joel McDurmon on American Vision.  The gist of it are excerpts from a foreword Moore wrote to a book by some other evangelicals about how the "Christian Right" was used by the political machine.

In the foreword, Moore's says we should return to Sola Scriptura in the realm of public policy and politics as well as doctrine.  He calls for repentance and intercessory prayer. 

As a Christian, I am a Sola Scriptura, Sola Fide kind of guy.  If I were not, I would go down and join the Roman Catholic church.  However, my RC friends generally have the same worldview that I have.  We all think immorality and abortion are bad.  If I had children in school these days, I would home-school or send them to a Christian school, and I would not be too particular if it were Catholic or Protestant. 

Sola Scriptura is a foundation doctrine of the Reformation.  It is part of who we are as Protestants, but I have a hard time seeing how it "fixes" the problems in America.  What we need is a return to limited, constitutional government with a reduction in federal bureaucracy and a restoration of state, local, and individual sovereignty. 

So what if the 20% of the electorate is fundamentalist evangelical Protestant?  What do you think that is going to get you?  John Ashcroft?  I used to sit in church with John Ashcroft.  As I may have said before, his father, Dr. J. Robert Ashcroft had a tremendous and profoundly positive impact on my life, how I have lived and what I have done.  John Ashcroft was a decent governor, Senator, and U.S. Attorney General.  Was he light-years better than Eric Holder?  The DA who always lost to Perry Mason is better than Holder.  Did he make any real difference other than providing drapes for nekkid statues?  Not really. 

Certainly as individual Christians, as congregations and denominations, we are to be guided by our foundational doctrines and principles.  We do need to repent of indifference, apathy, and cowardice and be more like Dr. Dobson. 

But we also need to get government out of the lives and businesses of everybody.  I want to be free to speak the truth to my heathen neighbor.  I don't want a federal regulation that forces him to attend my church. 

Obamacare and the Pending Medicaid Crisis

Denninger posts on the weak GDP numbers. 

Market-Ticker commenter Zappafan makes an astute observation:

Karl I doubt there is a good way to prove it but I suspect a lot of that increased spending on social benefits is Medicaid spending. The blogger over at usdailydeficit dot com has noted Medicaid is running +14% YOY through the first 3 months of 2014.

This is undoubtedly due to Obamacare funneling a lot of folks into Medicaid. That's going to a**-ream the deficit moving forward.

Also, there is very little difference between the effects of shuttling more people onto Medicaid and subsidizing the premiums of people who sign up on the exchanges. 

My guess is that out of our 7 or 8 million sign-ups, many will be like an acquaintance of mine.  He is a forty-something farmer who has some health problems and runs a small herd of beef cows.  He has paid for his insurance for twenty-five years until his plan was cancelled last year.  He was forced into the exchanges.  When he enrolled, because of his low annual income, tax-wise, he found that his premium was fully subsidized -- not something he wanted or expected, but that's how it is.

With the high unemployment and under-employment rate of Americans under 35, the touted percentages of enrollments most likely means that fewer are actually paying than are being subsidized.  That money has to come from somewhere.  Every month.  Subsidized plans add to an already unsustainable deficit.  How exactly is this going to help "save" a collapsing Medicare program?  How is it supposed to reduce deficit spending? 

I Wouldn't Exactly Call It "Breaking"

BREAKING: Leaked Benghazi Emails Lead to White House.

You can read it on the Conservative Tribune link.  CT links to a Fox News story.

I am so shocked to learn that Obama lied about knowing this was a terrorist attack.  

 Of course they knew it.  They were watching it all fall apart. 

The fact is that Obama and his staffers, especially that stupid, sleazy Susan Rice, and disgusting, arrogant Hillary Clinton are guilty of allowing a U.S. ambassador and three other men die because they didn't want to spoil their triumphant narrative in the Middle East.  The Obama foreign policy is increasingly exposed as an ongoing, accelerating disaster.  Obama is as incompetent and inadequate in terms of doing his actual job as Jimmy Carter was.  

And nothing is going to come of it.  Hillary will be somehow cleansed of her part in this disaster and the even more disturbing cover-up.  The media will continue to ignore this as being a "non-story" -- just like the IRS targeting of opposition groups.  

I watched Rough Riders with Tom Berenger as Teddy Roosevelt and Sam Elliot the other night.  Considering it is a made-for-TV movie, it's not a bad Milius effort, reflecting both the genuine courage of Roosevelt and his men as well as the questionable political maneuvering and moral uncertainty involved in instigating the conflict.  My grandparents were big fans of TR and voted for him.  He was more progressive than libertarian, certainly, but he was a good, if misguided, American.  

I wonder, too, if Americans, including men like Roosevelt and simple people like my grandparents, could not afford to be more trusting of our government in those days.  That trust was clearly misplaced, at times, but it was not nearly as dangerous as the misplaced trust some of us had in our government and military after 9/11.  The press has always been easily corrupted, as Milius points out via William Randolph Hearst's portrayal in Rough Riders.  Now they are not capitalists but propagandists for the left.  Our freedoms are greatly eroded.  We must guard them zealously and fervently challenge all attempts to wrest any more from us, even as we fight to restore some of what we have lost.

Listen to All Cliven Bundy Had To Say

I haven't said anything one way or the other about the Bundy deal in Nevada because I do not understand the issue of grazing rights, water rights, and all that stuff in the West.  I've never lived there, and it is all foreign jargon to me.

What I do understand is that agents of the BLM killed some of Bundy's stock.  I also understand Bundy made the mistake of speaking forthrightly in an interview that he did not need to grant.  The NY Times then deceptively edited that interview to make Bundy look like a racist.

Go here to Pat Dollard's site and listen to the whole thing.  Read what Dollard says about it:

And he’s not blaming blacks for the issues of abortions, and crime and broken families, he’s blaming the Feds. This is the exact opposite of a racist, this is an advocate for the welfare and best interests of blacks. 

Understand that Bundy is using language which his age group was taught as being polite and respectful.   Growing up, around my dad's hunting buddy, Mr. Davis, I was expected to use the term Colored, and that's how my friends, his sons, referred to themselves.  Some might cringe at the remark about picking cotton, but, while I never picked it, members of my family did.  It was honest work -- which is Bundy's point.  People who do not have honest work to do may have a hard time developing self-respect, and without self-respect, it's much harder advance oneself academically and economically. 

Look, I still don't know what the deal is as far as whether Bundy should have paid the fees or if the BLM is harassing ranchers to benefit Harry Reid, but I do know that if the Times attacks a person, he can't be all bad.

The government and their allies in the media will always emphasize something negative about the people they want to destroy.  David Koresh was a nutjob, but that did not justify what was done to him and his followers by the ATF and the FBI.  Randy and Vicki Weaver were not terribly wise people, but that does not justify the cold-blooded murder of a woman holding her infant child.  Whatever Cliven Bundy's faults, it is time the federal government is put on notice that we the people do not have to take their high-handed crap.  Might does not make right.  Federal judges who have no respect for law, natural rights or individual liberty do not deserve our respect or obedience.  Unelected bureaucrats with their ever-increasing regulation can be stopped.

They won't be if we are waiting for their next target to be Mother Theresa, and if it were Mother Theresa, the media would do a hit-piece to smear her.  We are going to have to back flawed people if we want to turn this thing around.

People draining mudholes to build their houses, ranchers trying to make a living, farmers selling raw milk to people who want raw milk and understand what raw milk is are not the ones that are out of control.  The government is out of control.  The government needs to be checked.  The government is destroying the economy, the financial system, agriculture, manufacturing, healthcare, the auto industry and everything else it touches.

You simply cannot believe the stuff that is spewed out by the mainstream media.  They have no more qualms about telling out-and-out lies than Obama does. 

Double, Double, Government Bubble

Was Bernanke, and now Yellen, doing the weird sisters act with Quantitative Easing?  Was it really an "eye of newt" stab in the dark, a mumbled incantation to "create jobs"? 

One of the things I said back in late 2010 was that government bonds would be the next bubble, and the one that, when it burst, would be the big one.  At the time, it seemed unlikely to me that the bubble could be sustained for more than a few more months.

Via the Circle Bastiat on Mises.org, Hunter Lewis talks about The Hidden Motive Behind Quantitative Easing:

The Fed  said that quantitative easing was meant to create U.S. jobs, but this never made much sense. Even a hard core proponent of QE, Fed official William Dudley ( formerly of Goldman Sachs), admitted that the Fed’s own economic models could not explain how creating money out of thin air and using it to buy U.S. bonds would increase employment. Some link to rising stock prices could be demonstrated, if only through the cheap financing of corporate stock buy-backs, but then rising stock prices could not be shown to create jobs either.

One inference from this was that chairman Ben Bernanke, and now new chairman Janet Yellen, were just taking wild stabs in the dark. A more reasonable inference is that they had another reason for QE, one which they did not want to acknowledge.

Viewed in this way, the 2008 bail-out should be viewed not as a bail-out of Wall Street, but rather  as a bail-out of Washington. The Federal Reserve feared that the market for government bonds was about to collapse, which would lead to soaring interest rates, and a complete collapse of our bubble financed government.

The Fed did not have the option of creating money and buying debt directly from the Treasury. That would be illegal. The Treasury must first sell its bonds to Wall Street, after which the Fed can then use its newly created money to buy them back. Hence, in order to rescue the Treasury, the Fed felt it had to rescue Wall Street.

(Emphasis added by me)

 Lewis explains, also, that former Treasury Secretary Hank Paulson has told us that Russia tried to get China to join them in dumping U.S. bonds back in 2008 in order to completely collapse our economy.  At that time, the Chinese were not willing to go along.  I think it might be more realistic to say that China was not yet ready to go along with a bond dump.  Their economic "miracle" has been very dependent on the extravagance of the U.S. consumer and the easy-money policy here.  They needed time to prepare their own situation.  They have had that time. 

After Crimea, Russia withdrew its U.S. bonds from the custody of the Federal Reserve.  It would not surprise me at all that Putin is selling or is about to sell off those bonds and that China might be more willing and able to go along with it this time. 

I would not put much faith in the promises of "tapering" from the Federal Reserve.  QE was done to benefit the federal government.  We are now much further in the hole that Obama promised to "dig us out of".  We have talked before about what will happen if bond rates rise dramatically.  We know that inflation is once again putting pressure on people, and more QE will only worsen the consumer's position. 

On one end of the spectrum, there are food riots and "tanks in the streets"; on the other end is hyperinflation, Zimbabwe and the Wiemar Republic.  In the middle, there is Japanese-style stagnation and "lost decades".  The right road is, as Galadriel told Frodo, the edge of a knife.  At best, if we can discipline ourselves, it is painful and slow.  Politically, the only real solution is simply unacceptable.  Those living within the Beltway Bubble will never willing give up their power. 

The Fed has, with the other central banks, held it together far longer than I expected.  Can they keep it going and somehow right the ship?  I don't see how, but I've been wrong betting against them so far. Though, even being wrong, I don't lay awake at night worrying about what is going to happen.

Humansville (MO) Police Serve and Protect

Elbert Breshears is an elderly man living in the small town of Humansville, in Polk County, Missouri.  His wife suffers from dementia, and it seems that Breshears has been trying, until very recently, to care for her in their home.

It sounds as though Mrs. Breshears had some sort of episode in which she knocked out a window of their house and may have run into the street.  Mr. Breshears called for an ambulance and went out into their yard to try and restrain his wife until the paramedics arrived.  While they were waiting, the husband had his hands on his wife's arm.  She was waving, I think he said, her shirt and calling for help.

Police arrived before the ambulance.

When police got there,"police car drove up, he bailed out ran over and knocked me down. He told me to get up, I told him I couldn't," he explained.

That's when Breshears says police got aggressive. "First thing, I know they grab me, threw me out there on the gravel. One of them sat down on my back, the other sat down on my head. They were trying to get handcuffs on me. I told them I can't get my hands up. I have no objection to being handcuffed," says Breshears.

When the ambulance did arrive, both Breshears and his wife were taken to the hospital where he was treated for his injuries, which included removing gravel from his facial wounds and getting stitches.

The Humansville police chief declined to appear on camera but insisted that Breshears is guilty of "elder abuse", resisting arrest, and assaulting a police officer.

It is hard to see how the police officers who battered Elbert Breshears could have perceived him as a threat, or why they refused to listen to his side of the story, or why they seemed to have ignored the fact that he had called for help for his wife.  The population of Humansville is only about 1000.  I would guess that the officers knew Breshears and thus knew of his wife's condition. 

There may be a little more to the story as the report mentions that, Breshears says he first started having problems with police at the beginning of the year.  It sounds like the old man may have been perceived by the police -- and possibly the community, as either a troublemaker or someone who was being abusive to his ailing spouse.  Still, overall, I think the picture below captures the essence of the incident:

 

 A classic via Wolfgang's Vault