Nancy Pelosi is attacking those who suggest the impeachment inquiry might be a bad idea:
God forbid the voters should get to decide on their president.
The Electoral College is a good idea, and it's a long-standing process. It has worked, and it's the law. Trump played by the rules and won. Whatever a person thinks of Trump, that's the way it works. A lot of people haven't liked various presidents, but, as Americans -- with notable exceptions in the cases of Lincoln, Kennedy, Garfield, and McKinley, plus some failed attempts, we have lived with them. It is unwise in the extreme to pursue a different path for at its end lies "le Rasoir national", as the French once called it.
I do not have to like Trump anymore than I had to like Obama, Bush, or Clinton to realize that trying to overturn a legitimate election is a recipe for disaster. The Republicans tried with Clinton. I despised and still despise Clinton, but it was a bad idea. It is an even worse idea this time. In Clinton's case, most people looked at the process as a joke, but at least there was a semblance of order about it. Congress more or less played by the rules with a special prosecutor. News was controlled by the mainstream media with very little resistance outside of talk radio. Chaos was minimal.
This time, Trump has direct access to his supporters via the internet. A majority of Americans no longer trust the national new syndicates. A lot of us get our information through various channels via the internet. We are already deeply divided in our attitudes toward the federal government. The divide is not Republican versus Democrat.
I, for example, no longer consider myself a Republican, thanks mostly to the Bushes, John McCain, and Mitt Romney. If those idiots are right, I'd rather be wrong. I am a nationalist because I'm not a globalist. I believe in America First and in limited, tightly-controlled legal immigration. I think there is a deep-state that consists of long-entrenched globalists in positions of power in the federal government. Their concern is not what is best for the majority of Americans, but what is best for them and their corporate cronies who benefit from all those billions in federal government expenditures. That includes the defense contractors, the big agricultural conglomerates, investment bankers, and others who love the subsidies they have lobbied for themselves. Those are the players who see Trump's rise to power while spouting populist and nationalist sentiments as a threat.
It really doesn't matter that much whether Trump means what he says entirely -- though he does appear to really believe some of it. What matters is that he has given voice to something a significant segment of the American populace has sensed for a long time. That's what makes him dangerous. What they don't seem to understand is that a lot of us see their resistance to Trump as a threat to us, and we would see his removal outside of an election loss as a coup.
If Trump is impeached, there could well be protests against the House. If he is removed from office, I honestly think we could see an uprising, and it could get violent. I would not be surprised by anything at that point because the Rule of Law is the Load-Bearing Wall.
As entertaining as I might find it to see Nancy Pelosi, Adam Schiff, Mitt Romney, and numerous other politicians from both sides of the aisle dragged out of the Capitol and strung up on lampposts, it would not be the best outcome for our posterity. I do not want that load-bearing wall removed. It would be the end of much that I have loved and looked to all my life. Pelosi's attitude is wrong and short-sighted, even from a political standpoint. I hope she comes to her senses and ends this travesty before the wall falls down and leaves us all in the rubble.
"The weak response to these hearings has been, 'Let the election decide.' That dangerous position only adds to the urgency of our action, because POTUS is jeopardizing the integrity of the 2020 elections."
God forbid the voters should get to decide on their president.
The Electoral College is a good idea, and it's a long-standing process. It has worked, and it's the law. Trump played by the rules and won. Whatever a person thinks of Trump, that's the way it works. A lot of people haven't liked various presidents, but, as Americans -- with notable exceptions in the cases of Lincoln, Kennedy, Garfield, and McKinley, plus some failed attempts, we have lived with them. It is unwise in the extreme to pursue a different path for at its end lies "le Rasoir national", as the French once called it.
I do not have to like Trump anymore than I had to like Obama, Bush, or Clinton to realize that trying to overturn a legitimate election is a recipe for disaster. The Republicans tried with Clinton. I despised and still despise Clinton, but it was a bad idea. It is an even worse idea this time. In Clinton's case, most people looked at the process as a joke, but at least there was a semblance of order about it. Congress more or less played by the rules with a special prosecutor. News was controlled by the mainstream media with very little resistance outside of talk radio. Chaos was minimal.
This time, Trump has direct access to his supporters via the internet. A majority of Americans no longer trust the national new syndicates. A lot of us get our information through various channels via the internet. We are already deeply divided in our attitudes toward the federal government. The divide is not Republican versus Democrat.
I, for example, no longer consider myself a Republican, thanks mostly to the Bushes, John McCain, and Mitt Romney. If those idiots are right, I'd rather be wrong. I am a nationalist because I'm not a globalist. I believe in America First and in limited, tightly-controlled legal immigration. I think there is a deep-state that consists of long-entrenched globalists in positions of power in the federal government. Their concern is not what is best for the majority of Americans, but what is best for them and their corporate cronies who benefit from all those billions in federal government expenditures. That includes the defense contractors, the big agricultural conglomerates, investment bankers, and others who love the subsidies they have lobbied for themselves. Those are the players who see Trump's rise to power while spouting populist and nationalist sentiments as a threat.
It really doesn't matter that much whether Trump means what he says entirely -- though he does appear to really believe some of it. What matters is that he has given voice to something a significant segment of the American populace has sensed for a long time. That's what makes him dangerous. What they don't seem to understand is that a lot of us see their resistance to Trump as a threat to us, and we would see his removal outside of an election loss as a coup.
If Trump is impeached, there could well be protests against the House. If he is removed from office, I honestly think we could see an uprising, and it could get violent. I would not be surprised by anything at that point because the Rule of Law is the Load-Bearing Wall.
As entertaining as I might find it to see Nancy Pelosi, Adam Schiff, Mitt Romney, and numerous other politicians from both sides of the aisle dragged out of the Capitol and strung up on lampposts, it would not be the best outcome for our posterity. I do not want that load-bearing wall removed. It would be the end of much that I have loved and looked to all my life. Pelosi's attitude is wrong and short-sighted, even from a political standpoint. I hope she comes to her senses and ends this travesty before the wall falls down and leaves us all in the rubble.
No comments:
Post a Comment