Cui bono?
This is a latin phrase used sometimes in criminal prosecutions. It means, Who benefits?
If you want to know why something comes to the forefront, why some issue is being pushed or promoted, ask that question first. A parallel americanism is "follow the money".
For example, transvestites and drag queens aren't new. Why have transgender issues suddenly become the cause du jour? Maybe because there is money to be made? Up until four or five years ago, the idea of allowing young children to transition using hormones would have struck most people as unethical. My trans friend, who is about my age, and only began the process in recent years, thinks giving hormones to teenagers, let alone those who have not reached puberty, is a bad idea. Yet, it is becoming more acceptable. Who makes money off of it other than the news and entertainment (but I repeat myself) media using it to sell soap?
Pharmaceutical companies supply the chemicals, which, I would guess, will cause life-long medical issues requiring -- surprise, more drugs. But I'm sure it's all driven by compassion and morality -- and building demand for your product. A heroin dealer will always give you the first hit for nothing. Besides, public opinion has to be manipulated before the insurance companies can be intimidated into footing the bill.
It doesn't matter what the issue is -- health care, immigration, war, gun control, climate change, movies, music -- the question is always the same. Cui bono?
Am I cynical? I am. In this age of self-styled cynics, the problem is most of the professional ones aren't nearly cynical enough.
This is a latin phrase used sometimes in criminal prosecutions. It means, Who benefits?
If you want to know why something comes to the forefront, why some issue is being pushed or promoted, ask that question first. A parallel americanism is "follow the money".
For example, transvestites and drag queens aren't new. Why have transgender issues suddenly become the cause du jour? Maybe because there is money to be made? Up until four or five years ago, the idea of allowing young children to transition using hormones would have struck most people as unethical. My trans friend, who is about my age, and only began the process in recent years, thinks giving hormones to teenagers, let alone those who have not reached puberty, is a bad idea. Yet, it is becoming more acceptable. Who makes money off of it other than the news and entertainment (but I repeat myself) media using it to sell soap?
Pharmaceutical companies supply the chemicals, which, I would guess, will cause life-long medical issues requiring -- surprise, more drugs. But I'm sure it's all driven by compassion and morality -- and building demand for your product. A heroin dealer will always give you the first hit for nothing. Besides, public opinion has to be manipulated before the insurance companies can be intimidated into footing the bill.
It doesn't matter what the issue is -- health care, immigration, war, gun control, climate change, movies, music -- the question is always the same. Cui bono?
Am I cynical? I am. In this age of self-styled cynics, the problem is most of the professional ones aren't nearly cynical enough.
Well said!
ReplyDeleteAs a good detective would say: follow the evidence.
It is good to see you posting again. I hope you are doing well.
Hey, you, too. I was just telling my granddaughter about you the other day.
ReplyDelete